‘For Profit’ War

Screen shot 2014-10-07 at 6.46.52 PM

the mystery that is Franz Ferdinand

The biggest change I’ve seen in my life 50+ years is how most people now (generally) believe that wars are started and created for profit. It’s like “duh” — way to make buckets of money.

This ‘for profit’ angle of the origin of war is not new, it’s taught in every political science class  with Hegel on the reading list… but can we stop for a moment?  If we can pause, breathe, and step outside the dialectic and the explanations/ideologies which lay claim to telling history, we stand back  like a painter facing a blank canvas. The origin of war requires investigation  — that most wars were started for one group/person to profit over another within the understanding that there is never any excuse for this – this is the news whose time has come.  All the dialectics in the world can’t create a decent school, running water, or a clean bathroom. The first casualty of war is not just the truth, it’s also the infrastructure … but none of this is really news. Old Cicero asked, “Cui bono?”

…the profit professional can often be found in professorial positions…

I would twiddle my thumbs when I was taught about Franz Ferdinand and how this single event (his murder) was credited with the start of WWI. Did it add up to you? Theology is hardly confined to religion. The motivation and the cause for the delusion is important but what really matters is the solution.

We agree that war is a business and that it is easy to overlook the effects of war. The generational side effects that include longitudinal despairare scantily reported in the historical record – the grandfather who drank himself to death, the woman who lost her young adulthood and boy who never had a dad. War has a fictional telling that abstracts it’s brutality, a brutality none of us should ever know.

The media and especially the internet are studied and used to illustrate the mechanism – the buy and sell button – of the human and because war must be sold, the marketing of war is of primary concern — but it’s also it’s primary disadvantage… hehe, war can be unsold, the ‘internets’ can assist. War and it’s profit-motive can be reversed and profit can be used to create real things for real people.

So that’s the good news. John Lennon sang “War is Over” and it could be if we stop the general backchat, secret plans, patterns and consequence allowing the rogue elements of our mind to create the belief that there is no alternative to war,   when there is. Each one of us is a creator of an alternative if we choose, to do the leading by example and using what’s already here.

See what’s new in equality!
https://www.facebook.com/BasicIncomeGuaranteedByEqualLifeFoundation?ref=stream&fref=nf

“War is a Racket” Major Gen. Smedley Butler, USMC
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article4377.htm

Privatization and Passivity

Screen shot 2014-08-24 at 8.52.12 PM

Kenya Jones fills a bucket with water at a vacant house in her east side Detroit neighborhood. Jones has been without water at home for a month because her landlord has not paid the bill. (National Geographic)

Privatization will be the evaporation, not only of our water supply and other natural resources but also of whatever democracy there is left to fight for. Will we do something before it’s too late?

The word ‘private’ is ubiquitous: private sale, private offering, private community, and private communications. Privacy is so sought after – is that because we have so little of it? Are we willing to privatize our resources: our water, our earth and minerals, etc. because we have been socially conditioned to venerate all that is private…. is it our secret pleasure to want to ensure that, if need be, we too can avail ourselves of the privileges that come with privacy or are just indifferent or passive?

Detroit

Nearly 19,500 people living in Detroit have had their water service interrupted since March 1. The Water and Sewage Department began cutting of residents who missed their payments. Detroit has the highest “big-city rate” in the nation, 40% of Detroit live in poverty. Half of all Detroit water customers were behind on payments, owing a combined $90 million and yet General Motors and the city’s two sports arenas also owe millions in unpaid water bills but their water was not turned off.

Charity Hicks, founder of the Detroit People’s Water Board said, “”This is a test being looked at by cities across the US – even the world,” Charity says. “We will not let water be used as a weapon to remake the city in a corporate image. We will re-establish what it is to live in a democracy, with a water system that is part of the commons, that affirms human dignity and that ensures everyone’s access.” One woman said she got involved in the water battle after she received a $600 water bill for one month and yet Detroit has access to our nation’s largest fresh water supply.

The Guardian wrote: “The targeting of Detroit families is about something else. It is a ruthless case of the shock doctrine – the exploitation of natural or unnatural shocks of crisis to push through pro-corporate policies that couldn’t happen in any other circumstance…. and that. The water shut-offs are a way to make the balance-sheet more attractive in the lead up to its privatization.”

As utilities that were once services have now become authorities (in Detroit children are being removed from households that have had their water cut-off) at what point do we challenge our passivity? Supporting a policy that ensure the basics of food, shelter and environmental dignity for all, a policy unaffiliated with a political party, a big foundation or non-governmental organization, the Living Income Guaranteed can be implemented within our existing infrastructure. We don’t need to build a new waterworks, the one we have works fine.

Further reading:

In Detroit, Water Crisis Symbolizes Decline, and Hope
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/special-features/2014/08/140822-detroit-michigan-water-shutoffs-great-lakes/

Thousands March for Water Rights in Detroit
http://truth-out.org/news/item/25062-water-rights-march-in-detroit

Detroit’s Water War: a tap shut-off that could impact 300,000 people
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/true-north/2014/jun/25/detroits-water-war-a-tap-shut-off-that-could-impact-300000-people

http://livingincome.me/

 

West Virigina Deserves a Living Income

Image

West Virginia is in a state of emergency. Three in 10 West Virginia kids under age six live in poverty; tens of thousands more live right on the edge. More than half are low income or poor.

The recent coal industry ‘leak’ poisoned the drinking water for over 300,000 people. West Virginia did not even have regulations in place that would cover such a leak. According to the The Journal of the American Medical Association, WV has had a 550 percent increase in overdoses this decade— the highest in the U.S.

If West Virginia were a country it would be the 64th richest in the world – so why are the people of West Virginia among the poorest in the US? The national poverty rate is 15.9%. West Virginia’s is 17.8%. In terms of media household income, West Virginia ranked 49th among the 50 states in 2012, at $38,482. Only Mississippi is poorer.

Alaska, on the other hand, is the largest state in the U.S. with the smallest population. Just as in West Virginia, the wealth of Alaska has come from its natural resources.

Yet Alaska figured out a way to share the wealth of it’s natural resources with all its citizens. When Alaska started making lots of money in the 1970s oil boom, they came up with the idea of investing the profit from the oil. The result was the Alaska Permanent Fund – this Fund became a yearly, single, unconditional cash payment to every state resident.

Why can’t the same be done for West Virginia? As of yet, no other state has followed Alaska in distributing money from the extraction and profit of natural resources.

West Virginia should be next. The Alaska Permanent Fund is a a Living Income – an actual, working dividend that is helping the state of Alaska take control of its own economic future within a model of shared ownership of the natural resources. This is what West Virginia deserves.

“The current system is concerned with the well-being of the political connected corporatist instead of the common good – Appalachian communities. This system exists because legal privilege is granted to industry. The development of this socio-economic order is indeed political, as opposed to free and participatory. The current authority in the coalfields, the corporate state, is illegitimate – it is far past time we transition to society free of it.”

Investigate a Living Income Guaranteed

 

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.